In addition to its bi-annual publications, the SAcLJ also publishes special issues which focus on specific areas of law. The authors of these issues hail from diverse backgrounds, with articles from renowned foreign experts as well as leading local minds in the respective areas of law. To date, nine special issues have been published. These are
Due to the current tightened measures, our deliveries will slightly be longer than normal. We hope for your understanding in these times.
This issue features articles on: (a) the various prescriptive tests for inventive step in patent law, and how it could be further tweaked for enhancement in specific situations; (b) the need for the patent system to strike an appropriate balance of rights between protection and competition by examining the grant of remedies; (c) the recent Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, and how it represents a new mode for international harmonisation; (d) the issues surrounding the determination of authorisation liability, with a particular emphasis on the meaning of the word “authorise”; (e) the advantages of protecting the preparatory efforts of the makers or producers of databases and compilations; (f) the concept of authorship and the meaning of a “work”, and how these implicate the standard that is applied when one considers the question of copyright subsistence; (g) the relevance of the US transformative use doctrine to the fair dealing provision in Singapore, with an emphasis on the transformative characteristics of appropriation art; (h) a review of the development of copyright law in Singapore through the past 25 years, and how public policy considerations have shaped the legislative and judicial development of copyright law principles; (i) the anti-dilution right in modern trade mark law; (j) the increasing need for private methods of dispute resolution, with the introduction of the new generic top-level domain programme by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers; (k) the statutory interpretation of intellectual property law in Singapore, whether judicial creativity involved in such interpretation is desirable for Singapore’s intellectual property jurisprudence; and (l) a review of the operation of the World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Center, with particular focus on the mediation and arbitration of intellectual property and technology disputes.
Author(s)/Editor(s)/Contributor(s): Professor Sam Ricketson (guest editor)
PRICE (inclusive of GST)